Skip to content

Conversation

@MattShirley
Copy link
Collaborator

@MattShirley MattShirley commented Nov 14, 2025

Address #646 (phase 1)

@MattShirley MattShirley linked an issue Nov 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.34%. Comparing base (54819a3) to head (d11fad3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #686      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.27%   98.34%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        2085     2181      +96     
==========================================
+ Hits         2049     2145      +96     
  Misses         36       36              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.34% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ponyisi
Copy link
Collaborator

ponyisi commented Nov 24, 2025

Can you address the coverage issue?

@ponyisi
Copy link
Collaborator

ponyisi commented Nov 25, 2025

A bit of documentation in the docs area would be very welcome, e.g. in connect_servicex.rst . Can we get the three listed sites (maybe four with Purdue) set up with standard profiles?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ServiceX init CLI Command

3 participants