Skip to content

Conversation

@jessealama
Copy link

No description provided.

@spdegabrielle
Copy link
Member

@elibarzilay
Copy link
Member

FWIW, it would be much better to port any needed information to the documentation instead; it's certainly what I would have if it existed at the time.

(And re the discord post --- I think that much more than just documentation is needed here, the first thing is to make it actually useful with the many new things that were added to Racket since then... But the default mutation thing of CLOS makes it harder, which is kind of why I drifted away from it...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants