Skip to content

Create pinn_vs_traditional_solvers.md #984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create pinn_vs_traditional_solvers.md #984

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/tutorials/pinn_vs_traditional_solvers.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
## 📝 Goal of the tutorial:
This tutorial aims to document the performance trade-offs of using PINNs and high-fidelity traditional numerical solvers from the SciML ecosystem.

## 🧪 Scope of Comparison:

The comparison will be using a multi parameter PDE like the Burgers' or Heat Equation, where a physical parameter is varied.

* Approach using PINNs : Train a single, continuous PINN model as a function of space, time, and the varied parameter.
* Traditional Numerical Approach: Use an optimized solver to generate solutions across the same parameter range.

**Status: Work In Progress (WIP)**