Skip to content

Conversation

@drbergman
Copy link
Collaborator

extended asym div that allows for any combo of cell types for both daughter cells. Thank you @davidlzhou for contributing!

See the new sample project for how to use.

Config

<cycle code="5" name="live">
  <phase_transition_rates units="1/min">
    <rate start_index="0" end_index="0" fixed_duration="true">0.005</rate>
  </phase_transition_rates>
  <extended_asymmetric_division enabled="True">
    <extended_asymmetric_division_probability name1="type0" name2="type0" units="dimensionless">1.0</extended_asymmetric_division_probability>
  </extended_asymmetric_division>
</cycle>

Note: Order of name1 and name2 attributes does not matter. A hash map on unordered pairs of integers is used to get/set the relevant probabilities.

Behaviors

extended asymmetric division to <type1> and <type2>

Note: Order does not matter. A hash map on unordered pairs of integers is used to get/set the relevant probabilities.

drbergman and others added 6 commits January 15, 2025 13:41
- Thanks @davidlzhou for development and testing!!
- subsumes standard asymmetric division
    - old syntax still works: "asymmetric division to <cell_type>"
    - note: this syntax relies implicitly on the cell type the rule is being assigned to
    - hence, we need to an int to index these distinctly from the extended asym div rules
    - but they will still access the new extended asym div hash maps to get/set probabilities
- uses pairs of ints (cell types) as keys into hash map for asym div probabilities
- behaviors implemented
    - "extended asymmetric division to <cell_type_1> and <cell_type_2>"
- sample project added: `make extended-asym-div-sample`
- get and set functions for safe access to asymmetric_division_probabilities
    - asymmetric_division_probability functions to give robust getter access
    - set_asymmetric_division_probability functions to provide safe setter access
- reorganize so asym div functionality is inside phenotype.cpp and standard_models.cpp
- simplify write with new getters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants