Skip to content

feat(shield): pod disruption budget support for the cluster shield #2275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 24, 2025

Conversation

aroberts87
Copy link
Collaborator

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add support for creating PodDisruptionBudget objects for the Cluster Shield to minimize impacts during disruptive events.

Checklist

  • Title of the PR starts with type and scope, (e.g. feat(agent,node-analyzer,sysdig-deploy):)
  • Chart Version bumped for the respective charts
  • Variables are documented in the README.md (or README.tpl in some charts)
  • Check GithubAction checks (like lint) to avoid merge-check stoppers
  • All test files are added in the tests folder of their respective chart and have a "_test" suffix

@aroberts87 aroberts87 self-assigned this Jun 6, 2025
@aroberts87 aroberts87 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2025 19:05
@aroberts87 aroberts87 force-pushed the aroberts/feat/smagent-9295-cluster-shield-pdb branch from cad564b to d78bf5b Compare June 6, 2025 19:39
@mavimo mavimo force-pushed the aroberts/feat/smagent-9295-cluster-shield-pdb branch from c79b7f4 to 1e83cba Compare June 24, 2025 11:32
@aroberts87 aroberts87 force-pushed the aroberts/feat/smagent-9295-cluster-shield-pdb branch from 1e83cba to 2018823 Compare June 24, 2025 15:29
@aroberts87 aroberts87 merged commit 2b2d78b into main Jun 24, 2025
4 checks passed
@aroberts87 aroberts87 deleted the aroberts/feat/smagent-9295-cluster-shield-pdb branch June 24, 2025 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants