Skip to content

Use the right generic signature when producing a substituted function… #30362

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2020

Conversation

rjmccall
Copy link
Contributor

… type from an interface type.

Doing this requires us to re-introduce the concept of the contextual generic signature to SIL type lowering, but hopefully just in a few places.

As the FIXME notes, I found a problem here for substituted function types, but I need to land this first to fix ProcedureKit in the source-compatibility test suite.

… type from an interface type.

Doing this requires us to re-introduce the concept of the contextual generic signature to SIL type lowering, but hopefully just in a few places.

As the FIXME notes, I found a problem here for substituted function types, but I need to land this first to fix ProcedureKit in the source-compatibility test suite.
@rjmccall rjmccall requested a review from jckarter March 11, 2020 19:26
@rjmccall
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test.

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci test source compatibility

@rjmccall rjmccall merged commit 29ff0ea into swiftlang:master Mar 11, 2020
@rjmccall rjmccall deleted the subst-fn-type-interface-sig branch March 11, 2020 21:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants