Fix EscapeAnalysis value_to_bridge_object and strong_copy_unowned_value. #29408
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Noticed via code inspection. This could potentially miscompile, but we
haven't seen that happen to my knowledge.
Both value_to_bridge_object and strong_copy_XXX need to escape their
resulting value.
The implementation seemed to assume that it is conservatively correct
simply to avoid building a connection graph node for an value. This is
not true. Any value that has a pointer type requires a connection
graph node. The only way to be conservative is to create the value
node and point it to an escaping content node.
We can always declare that certain special types are not considered
pointer types, but then we need to handle all conversions from those
types to pointer types by escaping the resulting
pointer. BridgeObjects are often on the performance-critical path.