Skip to content

[libclang] Add API to generate a reproducer for the explicitly-built modules. #10577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vsapsai
Copy link

@vsapsai vsapsai commented Apr 29, 2025

Capturing a single -cc1 command to reproduce a bug with the explicitly-built modules isn't sufficient, we need to know what .pcm files were built and how.

rdar://59743925

…modules.

Capturing a single `-cc1` command to reproduce a bug with the explicitly-built
modules isn't sufficient, we need to know what .pcm files were built and how.

rdar://59743925
@vsapsai vsapsai requested a review from jansvoboda11 April 29, 2025 04:06
@vsapsai
Copy link
Author

vsapsai commented Apr 29, 2025

Right now I'd like to get a high-level opinion if such an approach for reproducers is reasonable. This feature will have more commits, to get an idea of how it is supposed to look like you can check users/vsapsai/reproducer-explicitly-built-modules branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant