Fix code samples for nested router functions

Closes gh-28603

Author: poutsma

src/docs/asciidoc/web/webflux-functional.adoc

@@ -590,10 +590,10 @@ RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route = route()
 	.path("/person", builder -> builder // <1>
 		.GET("/{id}", accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::getPerson)
 		.GET(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::listPeople)
-		.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+		.POST(handler::createPerson))
 	.build();
 ----
-<1> Note that second parameter of `path` is a consumer that takes the a router builder.
+<1> Note that second parameter of `path` is a consumer that takes the router builder.
 
 [source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
 .Kotlin
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route = route()
 		"/person".nest {
 			GET("/{id}", accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::getPerson)
 			GET(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::listPeople)
-			POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+			POST(handler::createPerson)
 		}
 	}
 ----
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ We can further improve by using the `nest` method together with `accept`:
 			.nest(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), b2 -> b2
 				.GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				.GET(handler::listPeople))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.build();
 ----
 [source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ We can further improve by using the `nest` method together with `accept`:
 			accept(APPLICATION_JSON).nest {
 				GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				GET(handler::listPeople)
-				POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+				POST(handler::createPerson)
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ For instance, consider the following example:
 				.before(request -> ServerRequest.from(request) // <1>
 					.header("X-RequestHeader", "Value")
 					.build()))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.after((request, response) -> logResponse(response)) // <2>
 		.build();
 ----
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ For instance, consider the following example:
 				ServerRequest.from(it)
 						.header("X-RequestHeader", "Value").build()
 			}
-			POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+			POST(handler::createPerson)
 			after { _, response -> // <2>
 				logResponse(response)
 			}
@@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ The following example shows how to do so:
 			.nest(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), b2 -> b2
 				.GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				.GET(handler::listPeople))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.filter((request, next) -> {
 			if (securityManager.allowAccessTo(request.path())) {
 				return next.handle(request);
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ The following example shows how to do so:
 			("/person" and accept(APPLICATION_JSON)).nest {
 				GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				GET("", handler::listPeople)
-				POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+				POST(handler::createPerson)
 				filter { request, next ->
 					if (securityManager.allowAccessTo(request.path())) {
 						next(request)

src/docs/asciidoc/web/webmvc-functional.adoc

@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route = route()
 	.path("/person", builder -> builder // <1>
 		.GET("/{id}", accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::getPerson)
 		.GET(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::listPeople)
-		.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+		.POST(handler::createPerson))
 	.build();
 ----
 <1> Note that second parameter of `path` is a consumer that takes the router builder.
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route = route()
 		"/person".nest {
 			GET("/{id}", accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::getPerson)
 			GET(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), handler::listPeople)
-			POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+			POST(handler::createPerson)
 		}
 	}
 ----
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ We can further improve by using the `nest` method together with `accept`:
 			.nest(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), b2 -> b2
 				.GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				.GET(handler::listPeople))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.build();
 ----
 [source,kotlin,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes",role="secondary"]
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ We can further improve by using the `nest` method together with `accept`:
 			accept(APPLICATION_JSON).nest {
 				GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				GET("", handler::listPeople)
-				POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+				POST(handler::createPerson)
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ For instance, consider the following example:
 				.before(request -> ServerRequest.from(request) // <1>
 					.header("X-RequestHeader", "Value")
 					.build()))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.after((request, response) -> logResponse(response)) // <2>
 		.build();
 ----
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ For instance, consider the following example:
 						.header("X-RequestHeader", "Value").build()
 			}
 		}
-		POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+		POST(handler::createPerson)
 		after { _, response -> // <2>
 			logResponse(response)
 		}
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ The following example shows how to do so:
 			.nest(accept(APPLICATION_JSON), b2 -> b2
 				.GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 				.GET(handler::listPeople))
-			.POST("/person", handler::createPerson))
+			.POST(handler::createPerson))
 		.filter((request, next) -> {
 			if (securityManager.allowAccessTo(request.path())) {
 				return next.handle(request);
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ The following example shows how to do so:
 		("/person" and accept(APPLICATION_JSON)).nest {
 			GET("/{id}", handler::getPerson)
 			GET("", handler::listPeople)
-			POST("/person", handler::createPerson)
+			POST(handler::createPerson)
 			filter { request, next ->
 				if (securityManager.allowAccessTo(request.path())) {
 					next(request)