Closed
Description
With a graph like this
the internal logic will determine C->D
as an indicator for a cycle.
It gets processed twice by A->B->C->D
and A->C->D
This should be a "directed" query instead of the data-driven one for cycles.
BUT I don't know yet if it makes sense because with a "directed" query, we would duplicate all the nodes and relationships behind the D
in two separated branches starting from A
.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels