Skip to content

DATAES-976 - Implement CrudRepository.delete(Iterable<ID> ids). #554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

schauder
Copy link
Contributor

Merge directly after DATACMNS-800

@@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ public void saveShouldSaveSingleEntity() {
public void saveShouldComputeMultipleEntities() {

repository
.saveAll(Arrays.asList(SampleEntity.builder().build(), SampleEntity.builder().build(),
.saveAll(asList(SampleEntity.builder().build(), SampleEntity.builder().build(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: We generally don't import Arrays statically to avoid clashes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I only knew the rule that static imports are ok in tests. Will undo

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reverted those changes.

Copy link
Member

@mp911de mp911de left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. One thing that I noticed is that deleteAll(…) doesn't seem to make use of entity callbacks or lifecycle events @sothawo.

mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2020
…teAllById(Iterable<ID> ids).

Original pull request: #554.
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2020
Use deleteAllById(…) from deleteAll(…). Simplify implementation in SimpleReactiveElasticsearchRepository.

Original pull request: #554.
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Nov 25, 2020

That's merged and polished now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants