Skip to content

Use TypeInformation instead of ClassTypeInformation #1456

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mikereiche opened this issue Jun 10, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1735
Closed

Use TypeInformation instead of ClassTypeInformation #1456

mikereiche opened this issue Jun 10, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1735
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement

Comments

@mikereiche
Copy link
Collaborator

Oliver Drotbohm 1:31 PM
Heads up: we've just merged a revamped implementation of the entire TypeInformation API now based on Spring's ResolvableType. All previous API is still intact, but we strongly encourage everyone to revisit their usage of ClassTypeInformationand its ….from(…) factory methods in particular. You should be able to replace those calls with TypeInformation.of(…) entirely and avoid referring to CTI at all. The mid-term goal is to hide it within the package, so that the only externally visible API is TypeInformation. If you find yourself struggling to achieve that, please reach out. The hiding move is planned for 3.1, but I'd love to get the official modules of the deprecated API for 3.0 already.

@mikereiche mikereiche added this to the 5.0 M5 (2022.0.0) milestone Jun 10, 2022
@mikereiche mikereiche self-assigned this Jun 10, 2022
@mikereiche mikereiche added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Aug 26, 2022
mikereiche added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2023
mikereiche added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2023
mikereiche added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant