Skip to content

Fix port schema #924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

matthias-pichler
Copy link
Collaborator

@matthias-pichler matthias-pichler commented Jul 17, 2024

Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler [email protected]

Please specify parts of this PR update:

  • Specification
  • Schema
  • Examples
  • Extensions
  • Use Cases
  • Community
  • CTK
  • Other

Discussion or Issue link:

What this PR does:

the schema for port was using min and max for the range instead of the correct minimum and maximum.

flowDirective also had an extra additionalProperties which is invalid for strings

Additional information:

Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@cdavernas cdavernas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Once again, great catch! Thank you so much for your awesome contributions!

@cdavernas
Copy link
Member

I guess you meant additionalProperties instead of unevaluatedProperties ;)

@cdavernas cdavernas merged commit e7dec69 into serverlessworkflow:main Jul 17, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants