Skip to content

Java-compatible enums #6576

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Jun 6, 2019
Merged

Java-compatible enums #6576

merged 20 commits into from
Jun 6, 2019

Conversation

anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk force-pushed the java-enums branch 2 times, most recently from c6e053a to b2a4898 Compare May 31, 2019 12:52
@odersky odersky mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2019
6 tasks
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk force-pushed the java-enums branch 5 times, most recently from d2340a0 to f845ed7 Compare June 4, 2019 17:39
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2019 18:04
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk requested a review from odersky June 4, 2019 18:04
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk force-pushed the java-enums branch 3 times, most recently from e1f7fdb to 5d5d108 Compare June 5, 2019 12:47
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall. Needs just some minor changes.

@odersky odersky merged commit c46553a into scala:master Jun 6, 2019
@anatoliykmetyuk anatoliykmetyuk deleted the java-enums branch June 6, 2019 22:06
@sjrd
Copy link
Member

sjrd commented Jun 7, 2019

I think there should be a test with a Scala-defined Java enum that is then used from a Java source file, exploiting some enum-specific features such as switching on them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants