-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
sbt build: ivy publishing of compiler not working #130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
szeiger
added a commit
to szeiger/scala
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2016
- sbt requires a `default` configuration in the Scala distribution but doesn’t publish such a configuration to Ivy repositories by default. This is not a problem when publishing to a Maven repository because Maven doesn’t use the concept of configurations and Ivy creates a standard set (including `default`) when resolving artifacts from Maven repositories, but it prevents the use of any Scala distribution published with `publishLocal`. The underlying issue is that sbt requires `default` instead of `default(compile)`. We work around this limitation by publishing a dummy `default` configuration. - sbt has hardcoded dependencies on the `scala-library` artifact of type `jar`. In the tradition of `sbt-osgi` we used type `bundle` when publishing via Ivy but this makes the artifacts unusable from sbt. We now publish the OSGi bundles directly as type `jar` (which is compatible with how they appear in Ivy after resolving from a Maven repository). - We have to be more aggressive about not publishing certain subprojects, otherwise `ivy.xml` files could still be published even when using `publishArtifacts := false`. - `removePomDependencies` now also modifies `ivy.xml` in addition to the Maven POM so that bogus dependencies do not leak into the Ivy descriptors. Fixes scala/scala-dev#130
retronym
pushed a commit
to retronym/scala
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2016
- sbt requires a `default` configuration in the Scala distribution but doesn’t publish such a configuration to Ivy repositories by default. This is not a problem when publishing to a Maven repository because Maven doesn’t use the concept of configurations and Ivy creates a standard set (including `default`) when resolving artifacts from Maven repositories, but it prevents the use of any Scala distribution published with `publishLocal`. The underlying issue is that sbt requires `default` instead of `default(compile)`. We work around this limitation by publishing a dummy `default` configuration. - sbt has hardcoded dependencies on the `scala-library` artifact of type `jar`. In the tradition of `sbt-osgi` we used type `bundle` when publishing via Ivy but this makes the artifacts unusable from sbt. We now publish the OSGi bundles directly as type `jar` (which is compatible with how they appear in Ivy after resolving from a Maven repository). - We have to be more aggressive about not publishing certain subprojects, otherwise `ivy.xml` files could still be published even when using `publishArtifacts := false`. - `removePomDependencies` now also modifies `ivy.xml` in addition to the Maven POM so that bogus dependencies do not leak into the Ivy descriptors. Fixes scala/scala-dev#130
retronym
pushed a commit
to retronym/scala
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2016
- sbt requires a `default` configuration in the Scala distribution but doesn’t publish such a configuration to Ivy repositories by default. This is not a problem when publishing to a Maven repository because Maven doesn’t use the concept of configurations and Ivy creates a standard set (including `default`) when resolving artifacts from Maven repositories, but it prevents the use of any Scala distribution published with `publishLocal`. The underlying issue is that sbt requires `default` instead of `default(compile)`. We work around this limitation by publishing a dummy `default` configuration. - sbt has hardcoded dependencies on the `scala-library` artifact of type `jar`. In the tradition of `sbt-osgi` we used type `bundle` when publishing via Ivy but this makes the artifacts unusable from sbt. We now publish the OSGi bundles directly as type `jar` (which is compatible with how they appear in Ivy after resolving from a Maven repository). - We have to be more aggressive about not publishing certain subprojects, otherwise `ivy.xml` files could still be published even when using `publishArtifacts := false`. - `removePomDependencies` now also modifies `ivy.xml` in addition to the Maven POM so that bogus dependencies do not leak into the Ivy descriptors. Fixes scala/scala-dev#130
milessabin
pushed a commit
to typelevel/scala
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2016
- sbt requires a `default` configuration in the Scala distribution but doesn’t publish such a configuration to Ivy repositories by default. This is not a problem when publishing to a Maven repository because Maven doesn’t use the concept of configurations and Ivy creates a standard set (including `default`) when resolving artifacts from Maven repositories, but it prevents the use of any Scala distribution published with `publishLocal`. The underlying issue is that sbt requires `default` instead of `default(compile)`. We work around this limitation by publishing a dummy `default` configuration. - sbt has hardcoded dependencies on the `scala-library` artifact of type `jar`. In the tradition of `sbt-osgi` we used type `bundle` when publishing via Ivy but this makes the artifacts unusable from sbt. We now publish the OSGi bundles directly as type `jar` (which is compatible with how they appear in Ivy after resolving from a Maven repository). - We have to be more aggressive about not publishing certain subprojects, otherwise `ivy.xml` files could still be published even when using `publishArtifacts := false`. - `removePomDependencies` now also modifies `ivy.xml` in addition to the Maven POM so that bogus dependencies do not leak into the Ivy descriptors. Fixes scala/scala-dev#130
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
publishM2 works, but publishLocal does not produce something that I can use for scalaVersion in another project
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: