Skip to content

Tidy up the mock dist server #1998

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2019
Merged

Conversation

jonhoo
Copy link
Contributor

@jonhoo jonhoo commented Sep 16, 2019

This is follow-on clean-up work from #1997 which tidies up tests::mock::clitools::create_mock_dist_server so that it is much clearer which versions are available with each "Scenario". I will mark this as ready to review and rebase once #1997 lands.

@jonhoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

jonhoo commented Sep 17, 2019

I believe the failing Windows test also fails on master fwiw.

@kinnison
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the failing Windows test also fails on master fwiw.

Travis' Windows testing is still in beta (and we'll probably drop it) so I don't predicate merging on that passing so long as appveyor is good.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 17, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1997) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jonhoo jonhoo marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2019 16:12
Copy link
Contributor

@kinnison kinnison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is very nice. I particularly like the proper Release struct with its associated methods.

Thank you. 👍

@kinnison kinnison merged commit 279e802 into rust-lang:master Sep 17, 2019
@jonhoo jonhoo deleted the tidy-dist-mock branch September 17, 2019 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants