Skip to content

doc: fix sentence structure in std::fmt #55049

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2018
Merged

doc: fix sentence structure in std::fmt #55049

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2018

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @withoutboats

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 13, 2018
@withoutboats
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 13, 2018

📌 Commit 2bb85b2 has been approved by withoutboats

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 13, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 14, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 2bb85b2 with merge 1ebcb21...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2018
doc: fix sentence structure in std::fmt
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 14, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: withoutboats
Pushing 1ebcb21 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2bb85b2 into rust-lang:master Oct 14, 2018
@tshepang tshepang deleted the fix branch October 14, 2018 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants