Clarify network byte order conversions for integer / IP address conversions. #49418
Conversation
|
r? @TimNN (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
src/libstd/net/ip.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
admittedly i'm not sure what this terminology should be here w.r.t. the removal of 'network order' and addition of 'host byte order'. i just took it as a suggestion from this thread. might be nice to get input from the libs/docs team here @rust-lang/libs @rust-lang/docs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To me the new wording seems good, and more easily understandable than the old version, although I'd be curious to hear what other people think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree. The new wording looks good, and this is how I'd expect this function to behave.
src/libstd/net/ip.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: I think this should be "a host byte [...]" (At least it should be consistent with the doc comment above).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good catch! addressed in the latest force push
…rsions. Opened primarily to address rust-lang#48819.
frewsxcv
force-pushed
the
frewsxcv-network-order
branch
from
e95ccc7 to
b89fb71
Compare
|
Why doesn't this include the |
ran out of time when i made this branch. we can expand to the the u128 impls in a future pr |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit b89fb71 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Clarify network byte order conversions for integer / IP address conversions. Opened primarily to address #48819. Also added a few other conversion docs/examples.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
6 participants
Opened primarily to address #48819.
Also added a few other conversion docs/examples.