Minor grammar fix 'can not' -> 'cannot' #39389
Conversation
The previous version suggested that the compiler chooses not to check, rather than being unable to check.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors: r+ rollup Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit 87bbb3c has been approved by |
Minor grammar fix 'can not' -> 'cannot' The previous version suggested that the compiler chooses not to check, rather than being unable to check.
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
|
@bors: retry
* build was stuck for 30m, maybe just a slow compile?
…On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-travis
<https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/196341170>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39389 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95DoX646a7cvZtlEUrAgqGEB-geIwks5rXLfCgaJpZM4Lwwnk>
.
|
Minor grammar fix 'can not' -> 'cannot' The previous version suggested that the compiler chooses not to check, rather than being unable to check.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
The previous version suggested that the compiler chooses not to check, rather than being unable to check.