Skip to content

travis: Wrap submodules updates in travis_retry #38904

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Let's try to squash some of those network issues with a travis_retry
tool to just retry the command a few times.

Let's try to squash some of those network issues with a `travis_retry`
tool to just retry the command a few times.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

cc https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Timeouts-installing-dependencies

was recommended by Travis for helping to deal with OSX issues

@japaric
Copy link
Member

japaric commented Jan 7, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2017

📌 Commit 882426b has been approved by japaric

@japaric japaric assigned japaric and unassigned brson Jan 7, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 882426b with merge 2ceb6e0...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2017
travis: Wrap submodules updates in travis_retry

Let's try to squash some of those network issues with a `travis_retry`
tool to just retry the command a few times.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: japaric
Pushing 2ceb6e0 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 882426b into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the travis-retry branch January 13, 2017 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants