Skip to content

doc: no need for an explicit iter() #32607

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2016
Merged

doc: no need for an explicit iter() #32607

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2016

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ use vec::{self, Vec};
///
/// // We can iterate over the items in the heap, although they are returned in
/// // a random order.
/// for x in heap.iter() {
/// for x in heap {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs &heap

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 30, 2016

📌 Commit fd78ae8 has been approved by apasel422

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
…asel422

doc: no need for an explicit iter()
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #32580, #32591, #32603, #32605, #32606, #32607, #32608
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit fd78ae8 into rust-lang:master Mar 30, 2016
@tshepang tshepang deleted the we-gots-intoiterator branch April 1, 2016 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants