Skip to content

Remove an almost-duplicated sentence from the enum page in the book #25420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2015

Conversation

habnabit
Copy link
Contributor

It seems to refer to something that used to exist, but got moved, and then not everything got cleaned up.

It seems to refer to something that used to exist, but got moved, and
then not everything got cleaned up.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2015

📌 Commit 568f13a has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request May 15, 2015
It seems to refer to something that used to exist, but got moved, and then not everything got cleaned up.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 568f13a into rust-lang:master May 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants