Skip to content

Fix issue #17848 (Questionable advice in bug report instructions) #18217

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2014
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 15 additions & 3 deletions src/doc/complement-bugreport.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,9 +33,21 @@ miss out on valid bug reports.

It generally helps our diagnosis to include your specific OS (for example: Mac OS X 10.8.3,
Windows 7, Ubuntu 12.04) and your hardware architecture (for example: i686, x86_64).
It's also helpful to copy/paste the output of re-running the erroneous rustc
command with the `-v` flag. Finally, if you can run the offending command under gdb,
pasting a stack trace can be useful; to do so, you will need to set a breakpoint on `rust_fail`.
It's also helpful to provide the exact version and host by copying the output of
re-running the erroneous rustc command with the `--version=verbose` flag, which will
produce something like this:

```{ignore}
rustc 0.12.0 (ba4081a5a 2014-10-07 13:44:41 -0700)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: ba4081a5a8573875fed17545846f6f6902c8ba8d
commit-date: 2014-10-07 13:44:41 -0700
host: i686-apple-darwin
release: 0.12.0
```

Finally, if you can run the offending command under gdb, pasting a stack trace can be
useful; to do so, you will need to set a breakpoint on `rust_fail`.

# I submitted a bug, but nobody has commented on it!

Expand Down