Skip to content

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines #134894

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Dec 29, 2024

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 29, 2024
@the8472
Copy link
Member

the8472 commented Dec 29, 2024

Thanks.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2024

📌 Commit 9007cb1 has been approved by the8472

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2024
Comment on lines 35 to 37
## Local Development

Refer to the [dev guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/tests/docker.html) for more information on testing locally.
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Dec 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may want to move the rustc-dev-guide local development docs here, or maybe move the above workflow docs to rustc-dev-guide lol

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? `@the8472`
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? ``@the8472``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134865 (bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros)
 - rust-lang#134884 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#134892 (Added codegen test for elidings bounds check when indexes are manually checked)
 - rust-lang#134894 (Document how to run the split Docker pipelines)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134870 (Fix sentence fragment in `pin` module docs)
 - rust-lang#134884 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#134892 (Added codegen test for elidings bounds check when indexes are manually checked)
 - rust-lang#134894 (Document how to run the split Docker pipelines)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e178795 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134894 - Kobzol:docker-ci-documentation, r=the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? `@the8472`
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 30, 2024
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the docker-ci-documentation branch December 30, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants