Skip to content

Do not emit invalid suggestion in E0191 when spans overlap #115077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 15 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/astconv/errors.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -597,7 +597,21 @@ impl<'o, 'tcx> dyn AstConv<'tcx> + 'o {
}
}
}
if !suggestions.is_empty() {
suggestions.sort_by_key(|&(span, _)| span);
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Aug 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you certain that the suggestion spans will end up sorted in such a way that two non-adjacent keys never overlap? If not, then since this is the error path, I feel like it may just be easier to do the O(N^2) full pairwise comparison here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SpanData manually implements Ord on (lo, hi, ctxt). That means that by sorting any two adjacent spans that don't overlap imply that the spans further apart from each other also don't overlap.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Aug 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about spans that overlap only at their end? Like spans that look like: [(1, 5), (2, 3), (4, 5)], where the first and last elements overlap?

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Aug 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, maybe it doesn't matter, since by construction that would imply any intermediate spans overlap. Idk.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your last comment is exactly right.

// There are cases where one bound points to a span within another bound's span, like when
// you have code like the following (#115019), so we skip providing a suggestion in those
// cases to avoid having a malformed suggestion.
//
// pub struct Flatten<I> {
// inner: <IntoIterator<Item: IntoIterator<Item: >>::IntoIterator as Item>::core,
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// | |
// | associated types `Item`, `IntoIter` must be specified
// associated types `Item`, `IntoIter` must be specified
// }
let overlaps = suggestions.windows(2).any(|pair| pair[0].0.overlaps(pair[1].0));
if !suggestions.is_empty() && !overlaps {
err.multipart_suggestion(
format!("specify the associated type{}", pluralize!(types_count)),
suggestions,
Expand Down
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/associated-type-bounds/overlaping-bound-suggestion.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
#![allow(bare_trait_objects)]
#![feature(associated_type_bounds)]
trait Item {
type Core;
}
pub struct Flatten<I> {
inner: <IntoIterator<Item: IntoIterator<Item: >>::IntoIterator as Item>::Core,
//~^ ERROR E0191
//~| ERROR E0223
}

fn main() {}
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/associated-type-bounds/overlaping-bound-suggestion.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
error[E0191]: the value of the associated types `IntoIter` (from trait `IntoIterator`), `IntoIter` (from trait `IntoIterator`), `Item` (from trait `IntoIterator`), `Item` (from trait `IntoIterator`) must be specified
--> $DIR/overlaping-bound-suggestion.rs:7:13
|
LL | inner: <IntoIterator<Item: IntoIterator<Item: >>::IntoIterator as Item>::Core,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| | |
| | associated types `Item`, `IntoIter` must be specified
| associated types `Item`, `IntoIter` must be specified

error[E0223]: ambiguous associated type
--> $DIR/overlaping-bound-suggestion.rs:7:13
|
LL | inner: <IntoIterator<Item: IntoIterator<Item: >>::IntoIterator as Item>::Core,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: if there were a trait named `Example` with associated type `IntoIterator` implemented for `(dyn IntoIterator + 'static)`, you could use the fully-qualified path
|
LL | inner: <<(dyn IntoIterator + 'static) as Example>::IntoIterator as Item>::Core,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0191, E0223.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0191`.