Skip to content

Fix comment that's been wrong since ancient times (thanks, @jvns). #11268

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2014
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/librustc/middle/trans/base.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
// * There's no way to find out the ty::t type of a ValueRef. Doing so
// would be "trying to get the eggs out of an omelette" (credit:
// pcwalton). You can, instead, find out its TypeRef by calling val_ty,
// but many TypeRefs correspond to one ty::t; for instance, tup(int, int,
// but one TypeRef corresponds to many `ty::t`s; for instance, tup(int, int,
// int) and rec(x=int, y=int, z=int) will have the same TypeRef.


Expand Down