Update hashbrown from 0.12.3 to 0.13.1 for std

[Urgau]

This PR updates hashbrown from 0.12.3 to 0.13.1 for std.

r? @Amanieu

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 0b9feea with merge 7fc545f93715aca036195749e37ed403eebb33c6...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 7fc545f93715aca036195749e37ed403eebb33c6 (7fc545f93715aca036195749e37ed403eebb33c6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (7fc545f93715aca036195749e37ed403eebb33c6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.2%, 1.5%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-2.8%, -0.9%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-7.5%, -0.2%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-2.8%, 1.5%]	8

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.6%	[1.8%, 4.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.7%	[-4.7%, -4.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-3.8%, -2.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.2%	[-4.7%, 2.3%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	15
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.4%, 0.2%]	35

Bootstrap: 653.481s -> 654.982s (0.23%)

[rustbot]

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

• Stabilizing library features
• Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
• Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
• Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
• Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[Amanieu]

Looks like an overall improvement! However I'm planning on releasing version 0.14 soon (in the coming week hopefully) so maybe let's wait for that.

[Urgau]

Looks like an overall improvement! However I'm planning on releasing version 0.14 soon (in the coming week hopefully) so maybe let's wait for that.

As you wish. I don't see any harm in waiting but I also don't see any harm in landing this now.

[Amanieu]

Fair enough.

@bors r+ rollup=never

[bors]

📌 Commit 0b9feea has been approved by Amanieu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 0b9feea with merge ad6b20b...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Amanieu
Pushing ad6b20b to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ad6b20b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.2%, 1.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.6%	[-0.8%, -0.5%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, 0.4%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.9%	[0.9%, 2.7%]	8
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.0%	[2.0%, 2.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.6%	[-4.8%, -2.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-4.8%, 2.7%]	13

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.1%, 0.2%]	16
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.4%, 0.2%]	36

Bootstrap: 653.436s -> 656.342s (0.44%)