Skip to content

Review and update wiki FAQ pages for 0.1 release #1240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
brson opened this issue Dec 1, 2011 · 6 comments
Closed

Review and update wiki FAQ pages for 0.1 release #1240

brson opened this issue Dec 1, 2011 · 6 comments
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 1, 2011

These are prominent documentation and haven't received a lot of attention lately.

@kud1ing
Copy link

kud1ing commented Dec 20, 2011

For the issues we have a milestone "1.0 sort of stable". I guess this is different from "0.1"?
If it is, should we have a milestone "0.1"?

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Dec 20, 2011

That's what 'first supported release' is. I'll rename it.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 6, 2012

The code example on the language FAQ is way out of date. I spent some time looking through the code base for something pretty that showcases major language features but couldn't find anything I liked. Need to write something that uses things like alt pattern matching, record extension, spawning lambdas, other interesting things.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 6, 2012

I've made a pass over the language FAQ and aside from the code snippet I think it is mostly true.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 6, 2012

I've edited the other two FAQs as well.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 6, 2012

Replaced the snippet. Closing.

@brson brson closed this as completed Jan 6, 2012
bjorn3 added a commit to bjorn3/rust that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2022
The new logic is closer to what cg_llvm does.

Fixes rust-lang#1240
coastalwhite pushed a commit to coastalwhite/rust that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2023
Kobzol pushed a commit to Kobzol/rust that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2024
bors pushed a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants