-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Tweak common tool docs on type-implement-trait check #7583
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
r? @giraffate (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @xFrednet |
c961665
to
1414eaf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the documentation update 👍
1414eaf
to
1acdb49
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you so much for the update. This time I read the whole section and found some NITs where it would be great if you could look at them too 🙃
Common tool documentation uses `match_trait_method` which is deprecated. Additionally, adds information on why `is_trait_method` is not the preferred way.
1acdb49
to
86e92c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me, just one tiny NIT that you can commit here if you agree with it. Then I'm happy to merge it. This was a really nice catch, thank you! 👍
Add missing import `paths` for the doc example. Co-authored-by: Fridtjof Stoldt <[email protected]>
Awesome, thank you! @bors r+ |
📌 Commit f0cb8a7 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
See #7562 (comment).
changelog: none