Skip to content

Avoid single_match lint in macro rules #5397

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 31, 2020
Merged

Conversation

pmk21
Copy link
Contributor

@pmk21 pmk21 commented Mar 31, 2020

changelog: none
fixes #5359

@pmk21 pmk21 changed the title Macro single match Avoid single_match lint in macro rules Mar 31, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2020

📌 Commit 79ab054 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 79ab054 with merge 09fe163...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 09fe163 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 09fe163 into rust-lang:master Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

single_match fires on same code with 2 conflicting suggestions in macro
3 participants