Skip to content

fix(clippy_lints/matches): wildcard_in_or_patterns will no longer be triggered for types annotated with #[nonexhaustive] #13456

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

vHugoObject
Copy link
Contributor

@vHugoObject vHugoObject commented Sep 25, 2024

fixes #13350


changelog: none

…triggered for types annotated with #[nonexhaustive]
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 25, 2024

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Sep 25, 2024
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Sep 25, 2024

Thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2024

📌 Commit bc07027 has been approved by llogiq

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2024

⌛ Testing commit bc07027 with merge c771204...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing c771204 to master...

@bors bors merged commit c771204 into rust-lang:master Sep 25, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

wildcard_in_or_patterns doesn't ignore #[nonexhaustive]
4 participants