Skip to content

make [mutex_atomic] more type aware #12008

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

J-ZhengLi
Copy link
Member

fixes: #9872


changelog: [mutex_atomic] now suggests more specific atomic types and skips mutex i128 and u128

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 25, 2023

r? @Jarcho

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 25, 2023
@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

Jarcho commented Dec 30, 2023

Thank you. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 30, 2023

📌 Commit a578b9b has been approved by Jarcho

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a578b9b with merge b19b5f2...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 30, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Jarcho
Pushing b19b5f2 to master...

@bors bors merged commit b19b5f2 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mutex_integer suggests using AtomicIsize over Mutex<i128>
4 participants