Skip to content

Fix excessive_nesting example #10918

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2023
Merged

Fix excessive_nesting example #10918

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2023

Conversation

Centri3
Copy link
Member

@Centri3 Centri3 commented Jun 9, 2023

whoops 😅

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 9, 2023

r? @xFrednet

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 9, 2023
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Just looked at the lint list ^^ nice catch!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 10, 2023

📌 Commit d1957b8 has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 10, 2023

⌛ Testing commit d1957b8 with merge 9011c4d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 10, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 9011c4d to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9011c4d into rust-lang:master Jun 10, 2023
@Centri3 Centri3 deleted the patch-2 branch June 10, 2023 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants