Skip to content

[useless_conversion]: pluralize if there are multiple .into_iter() calls #10881

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2023

Conversation

y21
Copy link
Member

@y21 y21 commented Jun 3, 2023

context: #10814 (comment)

changelog: [useless_conversion]: pluralize if there are multiple .into_iter() calls in the chain

r? @llogiq

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 3, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, that was quick. One small nit, otherwise r=me.

@y21 y21 force-pushed the explicit-into-iter-fn-arg-followup branch from ba6a9d8 to 5a7e33e Compare June 3, 2023 17:39
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Jun 3, 2023

Thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2023

📌 Commit 5a7e33e has been approved by llogiq

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 5a7e33e with merge fdb0b04...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing fdb0b04 to master...

@bors bors merged commit fdb0b04 into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants