-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Use large stack on expander thread #12891
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Since you're there, can you also give the thread a name? And by the way, what does this thread do? |
Ah, 32ee097 |
Could also use a |
Er, I ran Edit: Nevermind, apparently I didn't and just thought I did. Sorry for the noise. |
8662867
to
6f9bf85
Compare
6f9bf85
to
f83738e
Compare
.join(); | ||
}) { | ||
Ok(handle) => handle.join(), | ||
Err(e) => std::panic::resume_unwind(Box::new(e)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might be missing something, but wouldn't unwrap
be fine here?
Sorry for all the nitpicks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does that still apply if this is a simple io::Error
? I'd have to test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, whatever 😆.
@bors r+
@bors delegate+ |
✌️ @brennanvincent can now approve this pull request |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
I have verified that this fixes #12884 for me.
Hat tip to @bjorn3 for identifying the cause of the issue.