Add development-tools.procedural-macro-helpers category #545
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I agree that none of the existing categories are a good fit. I would apply this category (or something similar) if it existed. Thanks! |
|
Sounds good!! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are two major tools that I think deserve this category on their own,
synandquote. I'm also working on a small helper for parsing attributes inside procedural macros, which doesn't fit into any of the existing categories directly.@dtolnay have you looked into categories for
synandquoteyet? Would you apply this category (or something similar) if it existed?I'm not 100% sold on the name, if anyone can suggest a better one I'd be happy to change it.