Skip to content

Add a note about doctest xcompile. #10132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Nov 29, 2021

This adds a note when running with --verbose if doctests are being skipped because they do not support cross-compiling.

I decided to use verbose instead of always displaying it because I felt it could get really noisy. However, I'm a bit on the fence. I'm kinda curious what is blocking doctest-xcompile from being stabilized?

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Eh2406

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 29, 2021
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2021

📌 Commit ca3356a has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2021

⌛ Testing commit ca3356a with merge 5335120...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 5335120 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5335120 into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2021
Update cargo

6 commits in 7f08ace4f1305de7f3b1b0e2f765911957226bd4..294967c53f0c70d598fc54ca189313c86c576ea7
2021-11-24 17:54:39 +0000 to 2021-11-29 19:04:22 +0000
- Fix some tests with output collisions. (rust-lang/cargo#10137)
- Description of the targets that can be applied (rust-lang/cargo#10109)
- Improve unused patch message when source URLs mismatched (rust-lang/cargo#10130)
- Add a note about doctest xcompile. (rust-lang/cargo#10132)
- book: add edit links to specific pages (rust-lang/cargo#10124)
- Add crate type flag to rustc command (rust-lang/cargo#10093)
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
This stabilizes the doctest-xcompile feature by unconditionally enabling
it.

Closes #7040
Closes #12118

## What is being stabilized?

This changes it so that cargo will run doctests when using the
`--target` flag for a target that is not the host. Previously, cargo
would ignore doctests (and show a note if passing `--verbose`).

A wrapper for running the doctest can be specified with the
[`target.*.runner`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#targettriplerunner)
configuration option (which is powered by the `--test-runtool` rustdoc
flag). This would typically be something like qemu to run under
emulation. It is my understanding that this should work just like
running other kinds of tests.

Additionally, the
[`target.*.linker`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#targettriplelinker)
config option is honored for using a custom linker.

Already stabilized in rustdoc is the ability to [ignore tests
per-target](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustdoc/write-documentation/documentation-tests.html#ignoring-targets).

## Motivation

The lack of doctest cross-compile support has always been simply due to
the lack of functionality in rustdoc to support this. Rustdoc gained the
ability to cross-compile doctests some time ago, but there were
additional flags like the test runner that were not stabilized until
just recently.

This is intended to ensure that projects have full test coverage even
when doing cross-compilation. It can be
[surprising](#12118) to some
that this was not happening, particularly since cargo is silent about
it.

## Risks

The cargo team had several conversations about how to roll out this
feature. Ultimately we decided to enable it unconditionally with the
understanding that most projects will probably want to have their
doctests covered, and that any breakage will be a local concern that can
be resolved by either fixing the test or ignoring the target.

Tests in rust-lang/rust run into this issue, [particularly on
android](rust-lang/rust#119147 (comment)),
and those will need to be fixed before this reaches beta. This is
something I am looking into.

Some cross-compiling scenarios may need codegen flags that are not
supported. It's not clear how common this will be, or if ignoring will
be a solution, or how difficult it would be to update rustdoc and cargo
to support these. Additionally, the split between RUSTFLAGS and
RUSTDOCFLAGS can be cumbersome.

## Implementation history

- rust-lang/rust#60387 -- Support added to
rustdoc to support the `--target` flag and runtool and
per-target-ignores.
- #6892 -- Initial support in
cargo.
- #7391 -- Added unstable
documentation.
- #8094 -- Fix target for doc
test cross compilation
- #8358 -- Fixed regression with
`--target=HOST` not working on stable.
- #10132 -- Added note about
doctests not running (under `--verbose`).
- rust-lang/rust#112751 -- Fixed
`--test-run-directory` interaction with `--test-runtool`.
- rust-lang/rust#137096 -- Stabilization (and
rename) of the rustdoc `--test-runtool` and `--test-runtool-arg` CLI
args, and drops `--enable-per-target-ignores` unconditionally enabling
it.

## Test coverage

Cargo tests:
-
[artifact_dep::cross_doctests_works_with_artifacts](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/artifact_dep.rs#L1248-L1326)
-- Checks that doctest has access to the artifact dependencies.
-
[build_script::duplicate_script_with_extra_env](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/build_script.rs#L5514-L5614)
-- Checks that build-script env and cfg values are correctly handled on
host versus target when cross running doctests.
-
[cross_compile::cross_tests](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/cross_compile.rs#L416-L502)
-- Basic test that cross-compiled tests work.
-
[cross_compile::doctest_xcompile_linker](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/cross_compile.rs#L1139-L1182)
-- Checks that the linker config argument works.
-
[custom_target::custom_target_minimal](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/custom_target.rs#L39-L71)
-- Checks that `.json` targets work with rustdoc cross tests.
-
[test::cargo_test_doctest_xcompile_ignores](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/56c08f84e28d3653ae0c842f331a226738108188/tests/testsuite/test.rs#L4743-L4777)
-- Checks the `ignore-*` syntax works.
-
[test::cargo_test_doctest_xcompile_runner](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/2603268cda3e32565ac27ee642f2b755fa590bac/tests/testsuite/test.rs#L4783-L4863)
-- Checks runner with cross doctests.
-
[test::cargo_test_doctest_xcompile_no_runner](https://github.com/ehuss/cargo/blob/2603268cda3e32565ac27ee642f2b755fa590bac/tests/testsuite/test.rs#L4869-L4907)
-- Checks cross doctests without a runner.

Rustdoc tests:
-
[run-make/doctest-runtool](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/25cdf1f67463c9365d8d83778c933ec7480e940b/tests/run-make/doctests-runtool)
-- Tests behavior of `--test-run-directory` with relative paths of the
runner.
-
[rustdoc/doctest/doctest-runtool](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/25cdf1f67463c9365d8d83778c933ec7480e940b/tests/rustdoc/doctest/doctest-runtool.rs)
-- Tests for `--test-runtool` and `--test-runtool-arg`.

## Future concerns

There have been some discussions
(rust-lang/testing-devex-team#5) about
changing how doctests are driven. My understanding is that stabilizing
this should not affect those plans, since if cargo becomes the driver,
it will simply need to build things with `--target` and use the
appropriate runner.

## Change notes

This PR changed tests a little:
- artifact_dep::no_cross_doctests_works_with_artifacts was changed now
that doctests actually work.
- cross_compile::cross_tests was changed to properly check doctests.
- cross_compile::no_cross_doctests dropped since it is no longer
relevant.
- standard_lib::doctest didn't need `-Zdoctest-xcompile` since
`-Zbuild-std` no longer uses a target.
- test::cargo_test_doctest_xcompile was removed since it is a duplicate
of cross_compile::cross_tests

I think this should probably wait until the next release cutoff, moving
this to 1.89 (will update the PR accordingly if that happens).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants