Auto merge of rust-lang#119604 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-vd0snqf, r=matthiaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117556 (Disallow reference to `static mut` and adding `static_mut_ref` lint)
 - rust-lang#119354 (Make `negative_bounds` internal & fix some of its issues)
 - rust-lang#119420 (Handle ForeignItem as TAIT scope.)
 - rust-lang#119506 (Use `resolutions(()).effective_visiblities` to avoid cycle errors in `report_object_error`)
 - rust-lang#119566 (Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`)
 - rust-lang#119567 (Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.)
 - rust-lang#119577 (Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint)
 - rust-lang#119586 ([rustdoc] Fix invalid handling for static method calls in jump to definition feature)
 - rust-lang#119588 (Move `i586-unknown-netbsd` from tier 2 to tier 3 platform support table)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Author: bors

Cargo.lock

@@ -3877,6 +3877,7 @@ dependencies = [
  "rustc_feature",
  "rustc_fluent_macro",
  "rustc_hir",
+ "rustc_hir_pretty",
  "rustc_index",
  "rustc_infer",
  "rustc_lint_defs",

compiler/rustc_ast_passes/messages.ftl

@@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ ast_passes_module_nonascii = trying to load file for module `{$name}` with non-a
 ast_passes_negative_bound_not_supported =
     negative bounds are not supported
 
+ast_passes_negative_bound_with_parenthetical_notation =
+    parenthetical notation may not be used for negative bounds
+
 ast_passes_nested_impl_trait = nested `impl Trait` is not allowed
     .outer = outer `impl Trait`
     .inner = nested `impl Trait` here

compiler/rustc_ast_passes/src/ast_validation.rs

@@ -1312,13 +1312,24 @@ impl<'a> Visitor<'a> for AstValidator<'a> {
         if let GenericBound::Trait(trait_ref, modifiers) = bound
             && let BoundPolarity::Negative(_) = modifiers.polarity
             && let Some(segment) = trait_ref.trait_ref.path.segments.last()
-            && let Some(ast::GenericArgs::AngleBracketed(args)) = segment.args.as_deref()
         {
-            for arg in &args.args {
-                if let ast::AngleBracketedArg::Constraint(constraint) = arg {
-                    self.dcx()
-                        .emit_err(errors::ConstraintOnNegativeBound { span: constraint.span });
+            match segment.args.as_deref() {
+                Some(ast::GenericArgs::AngleBracketed(args)) => {
+                    for arg in &args.args {
+                        if let ast::AngleBracketedArg::Constraint(constraint) = arg {
+                            self.dcx().emit_err(errors::ConstraintOnNegativeBound {
+                                span: constraint.span,
+                            });
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+                // The lowered form of parenthesized generic args contains a type binding.
+                Some(ast::GenericArgs::Parenthesized(args)) => {
+                    self.dcx().emit_err(errors::NegativeBoundWithParentheticalNotation {
+                        span: args.span,
+                    });
                 }
+                None => {}
             }
         }
 

compiler/rustc_ast_passes/src/errors.rs

@@ -763,6 +763,13 @@ pub struct ConstraintOnNegativeBound {
     pub span: Span,
 }
 
+#[derive(Diagnostic)]
+#[diag(ast_passes_negative_bound_with_parenthetical_notation)]
+pub struct NegativeBoundWithParentheticalNotation {
+    #[primary_span]
+    pub span: Span,
+}
+
 #[derive(Diagnostic)]
 #[diag(ast_passes_invalid_unnamed_field_ty)]
 pub struct InvalidUnnamedFieldTy {

compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/example/mini_core_hello_world.rs

@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ fn start<T: Termination + 'static>(
 }
 
 static mut NUM: u8 = 6 * 7;
+
+// FIXME: Use `SyncUnsafeCell` instead of allowing `static_mut_ref` lint
+#[allow(static_mut_ref)]
 static NUM_REF: &'static u8 = unsafe { &NUM };
 
 unsafe fn zeroed<T>() -> T {

compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/example/mini_core_hello_world.rs

@@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ fn start<T: Termination + 'static>(
 }
 
 static mut NUM: u8 = 6 * 7;
+
+// FIXME: Use `SyncUnsafeCell` instead of allowing `static_mut_ref` lint
+#[allow(static_mut_ref)]
 static NUM_REF: &'static u8 = unsafe { &NUM };
 
 macro_rules! assert {

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs

@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for Validator {
             mir_phase,
             unwind_edge_count: 0,
             reachable_blocks: traversal::reachable_as_bitset(body),
-            place_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
             value_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
             can_unwind,
         };
@@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ struct CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
     mir_phase: MirPhase,
     unwind_edge_count: usize,
     reachable_blocks: BitSet<BasicBlock>,
-    place_cache: FxHashSet<PlaceRef<'tcx>>,
     value_cache: FxHashSet<u128>,
     // If `false`, then the MIR must not contain `UnwindAction::Continue` or
     // `TerminatorKind::Resume`.
@@ -294,19 +292,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
 
     fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
         match &statement.kind {
-            StatementKind::Assign(box (dest, rvalue)) => {
-                // FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
-                if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
-                    // The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
-                    // the places are identical.
-                    if dest == src {
-                        self.fail(
-                            location,
-                            "encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
-                        );
-                    }
-                }
-            }
             StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
                 if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {
                     self.fail(
@@ -341,7 +326,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
                     self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{kind:?}` is forbidden"));
                 }
             }
-            StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
+            StatementKind::Assign(..)
+            | StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
             | StatementKind::StorageDead(_)
             | StatementKind::Intrinsic(_)
             | StatementKind::Coverage(_)
@@ -404,10 +390,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
                 }
 
                 // The call destination place and Operand::Move place used as an argument might be
-                // passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they must be non-overlapping
-                // and cannot be packed. Currently this simply checks for duplicate places.
-                self.place_cache.clear();
-                self.place_cache.insert(destination.as_ref());
+                // passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they cannot be packed.
                 if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *destination).is_some() {
                     // This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
                     self.fail(
@@ -418,10 +401,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
                         ),
                     );
                 }
-                let mut has_duplicates = false;
                 for arg in args {
                     if let Operand::Move(place) = arg {
-                        has_duplicates |= !self.place_cache.insert(place.as_ref());
                         if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *place).is_some() {
                             // This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
                             self.fail(
@@ -434,16 +415,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
                         }
                     }
                 }
-
-                if has_duplicates {
-                    self.fail(
-                        location,
-                        format!(
-                            "encountered overlapping memory in `Move` arguments to `Call` terminator: {:?}",
-                            terminator.kind,
-                        ),
-                    );
-                }
             }
             TerminatorKind::Assert { target, unwind, .. } => {
                 self.check_edge(location, *target, EdgeKind::Normal);
@@ -1112,17 +1083,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
                         )
                     }
                 }
-                // FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
-                if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
-                    // The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
-                    // the places are identical.
-                    if dest == src {
-                        self.fail(
-                            location,
-                            "encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
-                        );
-                    }
-                }
             }
             StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
                 if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {

compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes.rs

@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ E0792: include_str!("./error_codes/E0792.md"),
 E0793: include_str!("./error_codes/E0793.md"),
 E0794: include_str!("./error_codes/E0794.md"),
 E0795: include_str!("./error_codes/E0795.md"),
+E0796: include_str!("./error_codes/E0796.md"),
 }
 
 // Undocumented removed error codes. Note that many removed error codes are kept in the list above

compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0796.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Reference of mutable static.
+
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,edition2024,E0796
+static mut X: i32 = 23;
+static mut Y: i32 = 24;
+
+unsafe {
+  let y = &X;
+  let ref x = X;
+  let (x, y) = (&X, &Y);
+  foo(&X);
+}
+
+fn foo<'a>(_x: &'a i32) {}
+```
+
+Mutable statics can be written to by multiple threads: aliasing violations or
+data races will cause undefined behavior.
+
+Reference of mutable static is a hard error from 2024 edition.

compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs

@@ -525,9 +525,6 @@ pub struct DiagCtxtFlags {
     /// If true, immediately emit diagnostics that would otherwise be buffered.
     /// (rustc: see `-Z dont-buffer-diagnostics` and `-Z treat-err-as-bug`)
     pub dont_buffer_diagnostics: bool,
-    /// If true, immediately print bugs registered with `span_delayed_bug`.
-    /// (rustc: see `-Z report-delayed-bugs`)
-    pub report_delayed_bugs: bool,
     /// Show macro backtraces.
     /// (rustc: see `-Z macro-backtrace`)
     pub macro_backtrace: bool,
@@ -1004,7 +1001,6 @@ impl DiagCtxt {
     ) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
         let treat_next_err_as_bug = self.inner.borrow().treat_next_err_as_bug();
         if treat_next_err_as_bug {
-            // FIXME: don't abort here if report_delayed_bugs is off
             self.span_bug(sp, msg);
         }
         let mut diagnostic = Diagnostic::new(DelayedBug, msg);
@@ -1016,11 +1012,7 @@ impl DiagCtxt {
     // where the explanation of what "good path" is (also, it should be renamed).
     pub fn good_path_delayed_bug(&self, msg: impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>) {
         let mut inner = self.inner.borrow_mut();
-
-        let mut diagnostic = Diagnostic::new(DelayedBug, msg);
-        if inner.flags.report_delayed_bugs {
-            inner.emit_diagnostic_without_consuming(&mut diagnostic);
-        }
+        let diagnostic = Diagnostic::new(DelayedBug, msg);
         let backtrace = std::backtrace::Backtrace::capture();
         inner.good_path_delayed_bugs.push(DelayedDiagnostic::with_backtrace(diagnostic, backtrace));
     }
@@ -1430,10 +1422,8 @@ impl DiagCtxtInner {
             self.span_delayed_bugs
                 .push(DelayedDiagnostic::with_backtrace(diagnostic.clone(), backtrace));
 
-            if !self.flags.report_delayed_bugs {
-                #[allow(deprecated)]
-                return Some(ErrorGuaranteed::unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted());
-            }
+            #[allow(deprecated)]
+            return Some(ErrorGuaranteed::unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted());
         }
 
         if diagnostic.has_future_breakage() {