-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Feature request: autocomplete/annotations for annotations(e.g @bs.module etc) #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
BlueHotDog opened this issue
Nov 27, 2020
· 3 comments
· Fixed by rescript-lang/rescript-editor-support#61
Closed
Feature request: autocomplete/annotations for annotations(e.g @bs.module etc) #26
BlueHotDog opened this issue
Nov 27, 2020
· 3 comments
· Fixed by rescript-lang/rescript-editor-support#61
Comments
|
Right, my comments still stand though, no? how can the editor support building better bindings |
Might take some time. In the meantime, we've released a few snippets autocomplete support for |
cristianoc
added a commit
to rescript-lang/rescript-editor-support
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2021
cristianoc
added a commit
to rescript-lang/rescript-editor-support
that referenced
this issue
Feb 9, 2021
chenglou
pushed a commit
to chenglou/rescript-editor-support
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
One of the hardest thing in ReScript is finding the right magic of annotations. i find myself always looking at other libs and examples. just because there's no logic to it and very little organization(it's all under bs namespace).
One thing that might REALLY help is allowing us to just type
@bs. and have a list of all supported annotations with a helping text as to how to use them, when, and alternatives.
I think this is super important, i know for myself i would be able to write better bindings if some love was invested in this area, and good bindings are sorely missing in the rescript ecosystem.
Awesome v1 release!!! super pumped at the new direction ReScript is going!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: