Skip to content

export types, prepare TS config for migrating files #3537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 30, 2019

Conversation

cellog
Copy link
Contributor

@cellog cellog commented Aug 29, 2019

This is the last of the first step for #3500

woot!

src/index.ts Outdated
@@ -1,9 +1,31 @@
import {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we just use export Foo from 'foo' syntax here? Or is there some sort of optimization thing I'm forgetting about?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, I re-organized to put type exports at the top, take a peek. Not sure if we can continue to use export * from... once the types are in the files, we shall see

@cellog cellog force-pushed the cellog-3500-index.ts branch from 24a371b to 6378591 Compare August 30, 2019 14:25
@timdorr timdorr merged commit 7b0c760 into reduxjs:ts-conversion Aug 30, 2019
webMasterMrBin pushed a commit to webMasterMrBin/redux that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2021
* fix config

* export types

* use export from, reorganize

* fix stupid eslint rule breakage


Former-commit-id: 4e4c111
Former-commit-id: f07b43b
webMasterMrBin pushed a commit to webMasterMrBin/redux that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2021
* fix config

* export types

* use export from, reorganize

* fix stupid eslint rule breakage


Former-commit-id: 4e4c111
Former-commit-id: f07b43b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants