Skip to content

Remove exact versions from blog post #1447

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2018
Merged

Conversation

gaearon
Copy link
Member

@gaearon gaearon commented Nov 30, 2018

The problem with using exact versions, as pointed out by @sebmarkbage, is that this doesn't let us release minors in the middle. It is very likely we'll need more minors in the middle so let's leave some wiggle room.

I figured this might as well introduce a naming convention for our releases? :-)

@@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ We have a single vision for how all of these features fit together, but we're re

The gradual release strategy helps us refine the APIs, but the transitional period when some things aren't ready can be confusing. Let's look at what these different features mean for your app, how they relate to each other, and when you can expect to start learning and using them.

### [React 16.6](/blog/2018/10/23/react-v-16-6.html): Suspense for Code Splitting (shipped)
### [React 16.6](/blog/2018/10/23/react-v-16-6.html) (shipped): The One with Suspense for Code Splitting
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would have a nicer ring to it if we dropped "Suspense for". :-) But I want to emphasize the staggered rollout.

@reactjs-bot
Copy link

Deploy preview for reactjs ready!

Built with commit 2207347

https://deploy-preview-1447--reactjs.netlify.com

Copy link
Member

@sophiebits sophiebits left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

k

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants