Skip to content

Hooks FAQ #145

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Hooks FAQ #145

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

bartlomiejzuber
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bartlomiejzuber bartlomiejzuber self-assigned this Nov 4, 2019
@bartlomiejzuber bartlomiejzuber added the work in progress Author opened the pull-request but it's still being worked on label Nov 4, 2019
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 4, 2019

Deploy preview for pl-reactjs ready!

Built with commit 9fbfc55

https://deploy-preview-145--pl-reactjs.netlify.com

>
>We provide the [`exhaustive-deps`](https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14920) ESLint rule as a part of the [`eslint-plugin-react-hooks`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react-hooks#installation) package. It helps you find components that don't handle updates consistently.
>Stworzyliśmy regułe [`wyczerpującą-zależności`](https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14920), jest ona częścią pakietu [`eslint-plugin-react-hooks`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-react-hooks#installation). Pomaga w znalezniu komponentów, które nie obsługują aktualizacji w konsekwentny sposób.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rulse name exhaustive-deps should not be translated

@jakubdrozdek
Copy link
Member

Kontynuowane w #191

@jakubdrozdek jakubdrozdek deleted the hooks-faq-2 branch March 14, 2020 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
work in progress Author opened the pull-request but it's still being worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants