Arm64 workflow enablement #8947
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8947
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit bf3a078 with merge base 0721867 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
…/vision into arm64_enablement
…/vision into arm64_enablement
|
Hi @alinpahontu2912, I see this is related to #9080 which I'm also a bit confused about. Can you please share some context about this? As far as I know pytorch currently doesn't support Arm64 Windows. @seemethere @malfet , are we actively trying to support arm64 + Windows? What would be the support model for this platform? |
|
Hey @NicolasHug , Pytorch supports Windows Arm64. Nightly & 2.7.0 wheels are available, only not on PyPi yet. @alinpahontu2912 is currently working on Windows Arm64 support for torchvision and torchaudio. This PR, #9080 and pytorch/test-infra#6352 are all a part of this enablement. |
|
Hey @seemethere @malfet can you also take a look at these changes? |
|
@alinpahontu2912 @iremyux @aalina23 Thank you for the PR. Would it be possible to handle these build jobs in a separate repository that you would own, instead of within the torchvision repo? This would help us manage the fixed maintenance cost associated with new CI jobs. Even if we aren't directly maintaining these jobs, we still have to merge your maintenance PRs and deal with potential failures, which can add noise to our CI. By using a separate repo, you could work more swiftly without being held up by our reviews, and we could avoid the fixed mainenance cost on our side. Maybe @seemethere can advise on the technical feasibility of this idea? |
Added workflow for arm64 build of torchvision