-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.4k
bpo-34850: Emit a warning for "is" and "is not" with a literal. #9642
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
serhiy-storchaka
merged 7 commits into
python:master
from
serhiy-storchaka:is-with-literal-warning
Jan 18, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
97593cc
bpo-34850: Emit a warning for "is" and "is not" with a literal.
serhiy-storchaka b4a5ca1
Remove unintentionally inserted character.
serhiy-storchaka 4f906c3
Update iomenu.py
terryjreedy 880e671
Merge branch 'master' into is-with-literal-warning
serhiy-storchaka a7d4628
Update documentation and add missed "?".
serhiy-storchaka 0598770
Merge branch 'master' into is-with-literal-warning
serhiy-storchaka 05e81bd
Add comments.
serhiy-storchaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
5
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2018-09-30-11-19-55.bpo-34850.CbgDwb.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
The compiler now produces a :exc:`SyntaxWarning` when identity checks | ||
(``is`` and ``is not``) are used with certain types of literals | ||
(e.g. strings, ints). These can often work by accident in CPython, | ||
but are not guaranteed by the language spec. The warning advises users | ||
to use equality tests (``==`` and ``!=``) instead. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't special case True and False, those are not normally identity checked. I don't doubt that someone may have create APIs returning multiple possible types that requires this to differentiate between "real" values and bools... but yuck.