Skip to content

gh-96039: Corrected wording error in itertools doc #96105

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022
Merged

gh-96039: Corrected wording error in itertools doc #96105

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

MrSuspicious0
Copy link
Contributor

@MrSuspicious0 MrSuspicious0 commented Aug 19, 2022

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 19, 2022

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news awaiting review labels Aug 19, 2022
@rhettinger rhettinger added the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Aug 19, 2022
@rhettinger rhettinger merged commit 757c383 into python:main Aug 19, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @MrSuspicious0 for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @MrSuspicious0 and @rhettinger, I had trouble checking out the 3.11 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker 757c383d2465ce87f546f01568ec911bd226a084 3.11

@rhettinger rhettinger added 3.11 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes labels Aug 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.11 only security fixes docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants