-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
docs: use 'recursively' in the description of rglob, and mention globs in the os equivalences #94954
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…s in the os equivalences
Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Thanks @nedbat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
Sorry @nedbat, I had trouble checking out the |
GH-95071 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
…s in the os equivalences (pythonGH-94954) The r in `rglob` stands for "recursively", so use the word in the description. Also, glob and rglob can usefully be mentioned as the pathlib equivalent of os.walk. Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon (cherry picked from commit 6e2fbda) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <[email protected]>
@nedbat do you care enough to try and fix the 3.11 backport failure? If you are I can leave the 3.10 PR open for merging. Otherwise I'm also fine making this a 3.12 improvement alone. |
Let's just go with 3.12. Thanks. |
The r in
rglob
stands for "recursively", so use the word in the description. Also, glob and rglob can usefully be mentioned as the pathlib equivalent of os.walk.Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon