-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
Ignore what's new for MentionBot #521
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Because everybody is editing in every PR and that's finding wrong reviewers.
@Carreau, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @dstufft, @brettcannon and @skrah to be potential reviewers. |
For context I was pinged as a potential reviewer on #505, which I definitively don't have the skills to review, so I assumed it was the what's new. |
.mention-bot
Outdated
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ | |||
"findPotentialReviewers": true, | |||
"fileBlacklist": [ | |||
"Misc/ACKS", | |||
"Misc/NEWS" | |||
"Misc/NEWS", | |||
"Doc/whatsnew/*.rst", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a JSON file and cannot have a trailing comma.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops indeed, fixed.
Thanks! |
Ah, I guess tests are just failing on |
@dstufft yep, some breakage about keyword arguments; looked like it wasn't related to this |
The current logic is buggy and not worth the trouble. Core devs and triagers will be handling this event manually.
Because everybody is editing in every PR and that's finding wrong
reviewers.