Skip to content

bpo-29455: Mention coverage.py in trace module documentation #261

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2017
Merged

bpo-29455: Mention coverage.py in trace module documentation #261

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2017

Conversation

marco-buttu
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request fixes bpo-29455.

@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ annotated statement coverage listings, print caller/callee relationships and
list functions executed during a program run. It can be used in another program
or from the command line.

.. seealso:: `Coverage.py <https://coverage.readthedocs.io/>`_, which is one
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the rest of the documentation is seem like most .. seealso:: are alone on their lines with the paragraph on the next one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Carreau. I also changed the markup to reST list.

.. seealso::

`Coverage.py <https://coverage.readthedocs.io/>`_
A popular third-party coverage tools that provides very nice HTML
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tools -> tool?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"very nice" can be dropped.


`Coverage.py <https://coverage.readthedocs.io/>`_
A popular third-party coverage tools that provides very nice HTML
output along with advanced features such as branch coverage.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

advanced -> more advanced?

Copy link
Member

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! The issue is assigned to @brettcannon so I won't merge this.

@brettcannon brettcannon self-assigned this Feb 27, 2017
@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 5dfccb0 into python:master Mar 3, 2017
brettcannon pushed a commit to brettcannon/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2017
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2021
Move the controlling macro SLP_WITH_FRAME_REF_DEBUG to stackless.h.
Make the code independent from Py_TRACE_REFS.
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
jaraco added a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants