-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
gh-130379: Fix incorrect zipapp logic to avoid including the target in itself #130509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3532a44
Fix incorrect zipapp logic to avoid including the target in itself
pfmoore 60a96ff
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] b6ec2bf
Fix a whitespace issue
pfmoore 39aebcb
Merge branch 'main' into zipapp_issue
pfmoore 43210be
Report an error if the target overwrites a source file
pfmoore 8699b81
Merge branch 'main' into zipapp_issue
pfmoore a9f627f
Merge branch 'main' into zipapp_issue
pfmoore 8eaf2d8
Clarify comments based on feedback
pfmoore File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2025-02-24-14-46-20.gh-issue-130379.lsef7A.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
The zipapp module now calculates the list of files to be added to the archive before creating the archive. This avoids accidentally including the target when it is being created in the source directory. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
target
can be a file-like object.target in files_to_add
can invoke comparison of a file-like object with thePath
objects. Is it what we need?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe it's fine. A file-like object will simply test as not equal to all the
Path
objects. I guess I could add some sort of exception handling in case the user passes an object with a custom equality check that fails, but that seems like overkill to me.I was going to add a note to that effect in the comment, but it's long enough already and I wasn't sure it was worth it. The fact that you pointed it out suggests that it would be, though.