bpo-31904: Adapt the _signal module to VxWorks RTOS #12304
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the successive PR after #11968. In this PR we adapt the _signal module to VxWorks RTOS. The following is the siginfo_t type definition in VxWorks. No fields si_errno, si_pid, si_uid, si_status and si_band. So we set them to zero.
typedef struct _Siginfo { int si_signo; int si_code; union sigval si_value; } siginfo_t;More and full support on modules for VxWorks will continuously be added by the coming PRs.
VxWorks is a product developed and owned by Wind River. For VxWorks introduction or more details, go to https://www.windriver.com/products/vxworks/
Wind River will have a dedicated engineering team to contribute to the support as maintainers.
We already have a working buildbot worker internally, but has not bound to master. We will check the process for the buildbot, then add it.
https://bugs.python.org/issue31904